Long John wrote:
Well, LJ, first of all, I didn’t want to read the whole thing, but then made myself go back and trudge through it, for in
fairness how can one comment without reading the whole nine yards?
What struck me most is that I was reminded of the idea that we think we are all so unique…and it’s just not so. I’ve been a Dylan fan for some 40 years (with a few years in between for furlough & reprieve, and the mistaken notion I
could "move on" and
lay it aside

) and that could have been me,
in some ways , 30 years ago (there are
some advantages fortunately, LJ, as you know yourself, to growing older

). In
fairness to myself, however, I'm not the type of person who would get into that mode
without reciprocity and encouragement from the object of my fantasy.
As far as being creepy is concerned -- I suppose it could be considered that in this day and age. When I was young, there were crazies around to be sure, and some of us “peace & love” folks were perhaps a little too enthusiastic and carried away with the spontaneous, egalitarian concept of the time, but rarely with evil intent. (I do think Dylan overreacted a bit in perception of the Woodstock scene in
Chronicles. But then it’s a well known fact that he has a tendency to be shy and paranoid. Don’t let that accessible and friendly,
fellow well met, smile on Nashville Skyline fool you.

On the street, his
don’t approach me under any circumstances mask was well in place! But I guess
just as we can only imagine his life, he would also not really know what it's like to be on the other side of the fence...much less wall!

)
It wasn’t so common to have “celebrity stalkers” years ago. Then
a fan was just a fan and all those rabid Sinatra and Elvis fans were considered just silly and sort of amusing. I suppose John Lennon’s death brought
an end to a kind of innocence.
As for the author of this treacle is concerned, compartmentalizing her life as she does (the husband/family a sort of necessary afterthought, it seems) may be
fairly harmless to everyone but I suspect in the end, she is harming herself -- and if that’s all she does, I suppose that’s her own business, after all is said and done.
I must be feeling generous today

– the line that did stand out from this woman’s writing was “ I like how remote you are while delivering your songs with such yearning. "
And yes, in general terms, the muse, I think, sometimes gets way too diffused!

When things become public,
physically remote, screened and edited for impersonal, curious, censorious eyes; when the past gets replayed one too many times without significant one-on-one
interaction-- well, the results are just not going to be as dynamic as if it were otherwise...sort of like a "watered down love," if you know what I mean.
But what is...is. You do what you can do and that's all you can do -- but that doesn't mean you have to like it.
Sometimes those who have the power don't have the will, and those who have the will don't have the power. And sometimes neither one will have the power or the will.
Naturally, that's when the wheels fall off!
